F.D.N.Y. - Printable Version +- Firepics-THE place for fire photographers (https://firepics.net/MyBB) +-- Forum: Photos-MUST CONTAIN IMAGE IN ORIGINAL POST (https://firepics.net/MyBB/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Forum: Apparatus Photos (https://firepics.net/MyBB/forumdisplay.php?fid=12) +--- Thread: F.D.N.Y. (/showthread.php?tid=2103) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
|
F.D.N.Y. - edburke - 01-12-2007 That photo of 138 operating was the original fire photo that started me on the watermarking-it was taken by Robert P. Mitts, a good friend of mine, and has appeared all over the internet since he put it up on his website (now defunct). It was used by Aerialscope in a large marketing campaign, and they refused to pay for the image, and also refused to give credit to Bob for the photo, since they got it off the internet for free, and it wasn't from Bob's site, so they stated that it was public domain and that since it featured their product, they had every right to use it (not true). Bob never pursued the matter, and that, coupled with a few other issues led to him completely retiring from the fire photo hobby. Obviously this was an image modified by someone that took it from Bob's site. The site has been gone for over four years, but the image is still circulating the net. I think he'd get a laugh from the caption, but it shows why watermarking is so important to many of us. F.D.N.Y. - R1SmokeEater - 01-12-2007 Hey Ed, Bob had a good site/photos ! I was wondering what happened to him- Sorry to hear he stopped the pix ! F.D.N.Y. - Guest - 01-12-2007 [quote name='bender' post='66835' date='Jan 12 2007, 07:51 ']Pic looks great, but is it save to place the outriggers on a vehicle? I mean is it not possible that the car can roll in a direction? Ok it was his blame to park his car in a firezone. I also know a picture where a car parks in front of a hydrant and the smashed the windows on both sides to put the hose line through the car. Thank you all for posting the awesome pictures <img src='http://www.firepics.net/groupboards/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />[/quote] The driver didnt look at the other side but wat can ya do i mean it an honest mistake but awsome thing to see hahaha. F.D.N.Y. - Guest - 01-12-2007 He had one of the best websites ive ever seen! does he still take fire photos? F.D.N.Y. - edburke - 01-12-2007 [quote name='FDNYCFD343' post='66866' date='Jan 12 2007, 10:37 ']The driver didnt look at the other side but wat can ya do i mean it an honest mistake but awsome thing to see hahaha.[/quote] The way I remember Bob telling me about it, there was a heavy fire condition with people trapped, and they did just what they had to to effect rescues. The right decision in my opinion. Unfortunately, Bob has completely stopped photographing the fire service.....despite my best efforts to get him to reconsider. F.D.N.Y. - Guest - 01-12-2007 [quote name='edburke' post='66868' date='Jan 12 2007, 10:49 ']The way I remember Bob telling me about it, there was a heavy fire condition with people trapped, and they did just what they had to to effect rescues. The right decision in my opinion. Unfortunately, Bob has completely stopped photographing the fire service.....despite my best efforts to get him to reconsider.[/quote] Alrite i wasnt sure if that was true i heard that to. F.D.N.Y. - Guest - 01-12-2007 Has he thought of just taking his pictures and making another website? from what i remember he had tons of photos. F.D.N.Y. - Guest - 01-12-2007 [quote name='edburke' post='66868' date='Jan 12 2007, 10:49 ']The way I remember Bob telling me about it, there was a heavy fire condition with people trapped, and they did just what they had to to effect rescues. The right decision in my opinion. Unfortunately, Bob has completely stopped photographing the fire service.....despite my best efforts to get him to reconsider.[/quote] ED I remember his site quite well! It was one of the first I encountered on the net some years ago. Too bad others turned him off to the hobby! If I remember right he did photos of FDNY engine 275 and I'm not sure on this but I think he did ride alongs with them as well. F.D.N.Y. - Guest - 01-12-2007 [quote name='edburke' post='66862' date='Jan 12 2007, 10:17 ']That photo of 138 operating was the original fire photo that started me on the watermarking-it was taken by Robert P. Mitts, a good friend of mine, and has appeared all over the internet since he put it up on his website (now defunct). It was used by Aerialscope in a large marketing campaign, and they refused to pay for the image, and also refused to give credit to Bob for the photo, since they got it off the internet for free, and it wasn't from Bob's site, so they stated that it was public domain and that since it featured their product, they had every right to use it (not true). Bob never pursued the matter, and that, coupled with a few other issues led to him completely retiring from the fire photo hobby. Obviously this was an image modified by someone that took it from Bob's site. The site has been gone for over four years, but the image is still circulating the net. I think he'd get a laugh from the caption, but it shows why watermarking is so important to many of us.[/quote] Ed this is so true. I have taken some shots that I sent to Robert for that old site. I have found my shots floating around on other spots. (I sent a lot of Resuce Photos to him.) It's a shame that it happends. I have been ticted by it but I don't have the time or money to seak going after people. F.D.N.Y. - Guest - 01-15-2007 haz-mat 1 headin home after a box. F.D.N.Y. - Guest - 01-15-2007 sorry for the oversized pic. not sure how to scale em down F.D.N.Y. - Guest - 01-15-2007 [quote name='TakeItIn' post='68034' date='Jan 15 2007, 22:22 ']sorry for the oversized pic. not sure how to scale em down[/quote] Google search "Irfan View" Free program to edit,crop,resize and MUCH MUCH more for photos F.D.N.Y. - Guest - 01-15-2007 here's a couple of shots of ladder 36, engine 93, engine 83, and a poor shot of rescue 3. F.D.N.Y. - anesti - 01-15-2007 [quote name='TakeItIn' post='68030' date='Jan 15 2007, 22:19 ']haz-mat 1 headin home after a box.[/quote] was this saturday in the city i saw them leaving with what i presumed was their second piece was running a spare i saw numerous relocations and specialized units leaving manhattan. does anyone know what was going on? F.D.N.Y. - Guest - 01-16-2007 actually i took it a few months ago. rescue29, thanks for the info. i'll give it a shot. F.D.N.Y. - anesti - 01-16-2007 couple of shots from todays all-hands in da bronx ladder 59 the blue devils from segdwick ave F.D.N.Y. - anesti - 01-16-2007 eng 75 F.D.N.Y. - anesti - 01-16-2007 the 19th battalion F.D.N.Y. - anesti - 01-16-2007 tower ladder 33 F.D.N.Y. - Guest - 01-16-2007 damn, nice pics there. |